AUSTRALIAN
COUNCIL
FOR THE DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT
SCHOOLS - D.O.G.S.
PRESS RELEASE
267 #.
OCTOBER 10 2008
UBS, ( UNION BANK OF
SWITZERLAND )
NAB, ( NATIONAL AUSTRALIA
BANK)
AND JULIA GILLARD
EDUCATION SUPPORTERS SAY
NO WAY!
Julia Gillard Bad News for Public
Education from the Beginning:
Unfortunately for public education, Julia
Gillard has been in bed with big business from her very first
engagement as a Minister of the Crown. Very few people other
than members of the DOGS are aware that her first official
speech was to the Australian Industry Group on December 3, 2007.
This speech is absent from her Media Release list.
Straightaway she declared that she was going
to ignore the old battles between public and private schools .
She has fulfilled her promise to the point of trying to wipe out the
concept of public education from the Australian scene , both past and
present.
Gillard and the Union Bank of
Switzerland (UBS)
On the UBS website readers are told that
the Union Bank of Switzerland was formed in 1912.
The bank also claims to be
-
one of the leading financial firms
serving a discerning international client base
-
a leading global wealth manager ,
-
a leading global investment banking and
securities firm, and
-
one of the largest global asset
managers. In Switzerland, UBS is the market leader in retail
and commercial banking.
In a News Release dated 5 October
2008,entitled New York City Chancellor of Education to Visit
Australia, Julia Gillard promotes both the UBS and Joel
Klein, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education.
Readers are informed that:
UBS, a leading financial firm has
generously offered to sponsor Mr Klein's visit and I welcome the
active involvement of UBS in promoting the importance of
education.
Building strong connections between
businesses and schools is essential to building a thriving and
productive education community
Highlights of Mr Klein's itinerary will
include a major public address and dinner with leaders from the
business and school sectors.
DOGS note that if Mr Klein was so important
for Australian education, let alone public education, then our
government should have financed his visit rather than accept the
largesse of a global bank. DOGS further object to UBS supporting
the visit to Australia of an overseas visitor whose visit will
not be in the interest of public education.
Who is Mr Klein?
According to Julia Gillard, Mr Klein "is sure
to bring energy and a new perspective to the current debate
about how to improve schools in Australia." Julia Gillard
appears to think that "Joel Klein fits in with the
Rudd goals for 'quality education" in Australia ....making
schools more accountable for their teaching and learning...and
academic and cultural change in schools."
Mr Klein fits in with Rudd's mantra that
parents and children should "walk with their feet "and where,
despite their best efforts, schools are not lifting their
performance, the Commonwealth expects education authorities to
take serious action - such as replacing the school principal,
replacing senior staff, re-organising the school or even merging
that school with other more effective schools...Tough action is
necessary" ( See Rudd's address to the National
Press Club 27 August 2008) .
Mr Klein has been criticised in
Australia. DOGS refer readers to one such criticism on the Save
our Schools website under the heading Gillard's School
Reporting Model is a Triumph of Ideology over Evidence and other
articles at
http://www.soscanberra.com .
Julia Gillard the National
Australia Bank (NAB) Partnership:
Julia Gillard promoted a NAB partnership
project in Australian schools In a Press Release dated October
3, 2008 entitled Schools First in new $15 million NAB
Partnership . The initiative is aimed at "building stronger
partnerships between schools and local communities". The project
was developed by NAB in partnership with Melbourne CARES, The
Foundation of Young Australians, and the Australian Council for
Educational Research. Julia Gillard further noted that one of
the ideas presented in the Australia 20 20 summit was the
creation of a co-ordinated partnership between Australia's top
200 businesses and our schools. She said:
The Schools First initiative is exactly
the kind of visionary national collaboration that will help that
to happen.
She continued:
The Rudd government, in partnership with
business and the broader community, wants to ensure that every
Australian child receives a world class education and every
school is a great school.
What she did not tell the taxpayer/citizens
is found by reading between the lines.
The Australian Council for
Educational Research (ACER)
According to the website of What is Schools
First? at
www.schoolsfirst.ed.au , the ACER is a partner and will continue to review
successful school and community partnerships, adding to the
evidence that such partnerships can improve student learning and
indirectly build community capacity.
Who will be paying for this research?
DOGS note that the Board of Directors of the
ACER includes Professor Brian Caldwell as Deputy Chair, Dr.
Brian Croke, Executive Director of the Catholic Education Office
and Tony Mackay, Vice President of the Incorporated Association
of Registered Teachers of Victoria. For information on Brian
Caldwell and Tony Mackay we refer readers to Press Release 241
www.adogs.info/pr241.htm and Press Release 244
www.adogs.info/pr244.htm and Press Release 155 at
www.adogs.info/pr155.htm
What Kind of Partnerships?
In a scheme which appears to involve NAB subsidisation of public as
well as private education, questions should be asked about the
kinds of partnerships that will be encouraged.
Is this another version of Gillard's merging
of the public into the private sector? Will it be a
variation of Gillard's $800,000 Family-School Partnership Bureau
which involves combining of the Australian Council of State Schools
Organisation ( ACSSO) and the Australian Parents Council (APC).
Julia Gillard announced on 18 February 2008 that this new Bureau
would work with organisations across the country in developing
and encouraging effective partnerships betweens schools, parents
and the broader community. The question is: What types of
partnership?
DOGS believe that Julia Gillard is doing a
Schools Commission exercise, attempting to effectively push
public and private lobby groups together to the grave
disadvantage of public education.
Foundation for Young Australians
We notice that, amongst the partnership
with NAB is an organisation, Foundation for Young
Australians. On their website we note that an organisation
called the Education Foundation has formed an alliance with the
Foundation for Young Australians. In the process it appears that
the Education Foundation is now found at the same street address
and email address as the Foundation for Young Australians. They
also share the same Chief Executive Officer. We are led to
believe that the combined organisations will have a greater
capability to advocate in ways that make a real and positive
impact on the lives of young Australians. The increased focus is
consistent with both organisations' beliefs in enhancing
opportunity through learning and skills development. DOGS wait
to find a reference to commitment to public education in this
new group. We
refer readers to our Press Release 244 at
www.adogs.info/pr244.htm to get some background on the
Education Foundation. We noted in the earlier release that the
Education Foundation was attempting to re-define public
education to include private education.
Federal Liberal Party Supports NAB
"Schools First"
When the federal liberal party supports an
idea in the education field as a "terrific idea ," you know public
education is in trouble. According to a Liberal Party News Item,
October 2, 2008, the Honourable Christopher Pyne, MP, Shadow
Minister for Education Apprenticeships and Training said:
"I, (Christopher Pyne) think it is a
terrific idea and when the Deputy Prime Minister, Julia Gillard
announces it to-morrow I will be leading the applause.
According to Christopher Pyne,
"This new initiative will endeavour to
foster stronger partnerships between schools and local
communities.
DOGS believe that this proposal will promote
the unity of the graveyard for public education with the
stultifying of the promotion of public education because public
education must keep the community peace.
Public Education Should be Supported
by Company Taxation not Company Charity
Since 1985, the rate of company
taxation in Australia has fallen from 46% in 1985 to 30% in
2008. This does not compare favourably with Japan and the USA
where company taxation on January 1, 2008 was 40.69% in Japan
and 40% in the USA. Taxes have increasingly fallen upon the
individual income earner and consumer.
Budget papers indicate that in the year
2007-2008, individual taxation yielded $126.1 billion; company
represented $64.7 billion and GST $44.4 billion. Taxpayer may
remember that the GST was the tax we had to have for a quality
public education system. So why can't the public schools get the
at least $2.9 billion extra per annum they estimate as a minimum
requirement?
Imagine if the NAB had contributed at the
rate of even 35% company tax, not even 40% required in the USA.
There would be at least an extra $10 billion per year from
company taxation for
education, health and welfare. Instead of forcing the companies
to pay a reasonable tax rate to assist education, Julia Gillard
grovels to the NAB for a mere $5 million. But if the ALP
required NAB to pay only 35% company tax another $500
million would be available from the public Treasury to pay for
Education.
So, why grovel for a mere $5 million and
abdicate responsibility for a first class public education
system, when she could obtain 100 times more, namely $500 million
from the NAB for the public Treasury with a 35% company tax?
The ALP should Stop Running the
Nation State like a Party Political Machine
DOGS call upon the ALP to stop relying
on hand-outs to run the nation state. Gillard and Rudd might
think it is OK to grovel to banks and other businesses to obtain
finances to run the ALP. But it is irresponsible and an
abdication and abnegation of responsible government to place
reliance on private investment for a public system of education.
|