AUSTRALIAN
COUNCIL
FOR THE DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT
SCHOOLS - D.O.G.S.
PRESS RELEASE 280#.
16 JANUARY
2009
KIM E. BEAZLEY'S MEMOIRS:
FACT OR
FICTION?
DID BILL HARTLEY START
THE DOGS?
The Memoirs of Kim E. Beazley, Father of the House,
were published by Fremantle Press in 2009 and became publicly
available in Melbourne in early January 2009. DOGS obtained a
copy of the Memoirs of the senior Beazley. This politician was
the Federal Minister of Education in the Whitlam Government. He
was party to the promotion and administration of the so-called
Needs Policy which legitimated the giving of hundred of millions
( now billions) of dollars to sectarian schools. They looked in the Index and on pp 199 -200
discovered the following fiction:
Kim E. Beazley Senior:
Fiction
Meanwhile, Bill Hartley started an organisation for the
Defence of Government Schools ( DOGS), which challenged the
grants in the High Court...Americans
came to advise Hartley's team.
Fact
William Henry Hartley was never a member of the Defence of
Government Schools ( DOGS). He did not found the Defence of
Government Schools. The DOGS did not commence in 1973 as Kim
Beazley Senior alleges. DOGS commenced unofficially in the early
1960s. A bank account was started in 1964 for an organisation
called the Australian Council for Defence of Government Schools.
DOGS publicly commenced in May 1967. Bill Hartley was not at
that meeting and never attended any meetings of the DOGS
executive. He had no say in setting up the bank account or the
public launch of the organisation. Other DOGS branches were
established in New South Wales, Tasmania., Queensland, South
Australia and Western Australia.
Kim Beazley Senior further alleged on page 200 of his
Memoirs that Americans came to advise Hartley's team.
DOGS did have the most learned advice available from American
sources, namely the Rev. Stanley Lowell, from Americans United
for Separation of Church and State and Leo Pfeffer,
counsel for the many organisations who had won cases in the
American Supreme Court. Bill Hartley had no part in selecting
the above persons. These experts were bought to Australia,
addressed meetings, and advised the DOGS on their High Court
challenge to State Aid. The Rev. Stanley Lowell addressed a
public meeting at Dallas Brookes Hall in September 1971. This
meeting initiated the High Court Challenge and occurred
approximately two years before the events referred to by Kim
Beazley Snr. in his Memoirs.
William Henry Hartley was a signatory to the High Court Writ,
and during the period 1972/3 to 1980 when the Full High Court
Hearing finally occurred, resisted all attempts by the
Labor party lackeys to withdraw from High Court Challenge. DOGS
have never been ashamed to be associated with Bill Hartley. He
adhered through thick and thin, through extraordinary
vilification, to Labor Party principles and policy. He was cast
out of the Labor Party in 1987. If he had been a member of the
DOGS they would have been able to get rid of him in the 1960s,
as DOGS was involved in standing candidates for Parliament in
competition with the Labor, Coalition and DLP Parties.
Kim C Beazley Junior:
DOGS also discovered the following fiction in Kim C. Beazley 's
(Junior) Introduction to his father's Memoirs, pp 8-9:
Fiction:
Professor Peter Tannock, who, as a young academic was appointed
to head the new Schools Commission.
Fact:
A reading of WHO'S WHO in Australia, 2005 reveals the entries of
both Ken McKinnon and Peter Tannock. Peter Tannock was not
appointed to head the New Schools Commission.
The entry for Ken McKinnon at page 1236 reads, in part :
Interim Cttee 1973-74, Chrmn Aust. Schs Commsn 1974-81;
Without the abbreviations the above reads: Interim Committee
1973-74; Chairman Australian Schools Commission 1974-1981.
The entry for Peter Tannock at page 1820 reads, in part:
Chrmn Cwealth Schs Commsn 1981-85
Without the abbreviations, the above reads: Chairman
Commonwealth Schools Commission 1981-85. Tannock was appointed
Chairperson of the Commonwealth Schools Commission by the
Coalition Government under Fraser in the 1980s, not by the
Whitlam Government in the 1970s.
Following his father Kim C. Beazley appears to produce fiction
instead of fact.
Warning to Commentators and Reviewers of the Memoirs of
Kim E. Beazley: Father of the House
John Howard has already commented in relation to the Memoirs
of Kim E. Beazley . DOGS quote from a letter he wrote to
The Australian on January 3, 2009. DOGS
reproduce a section of this letter:
Mike Steketee was right to praise Kim Beazley Sr (
'Principle not power for prescient servant of the people',
Opinion, 1/1). He was principled, erudite and the most
compelling orator, on the Labor side, that I heard in my 33
years in federal parliament.
DOGS will challenge any summary of Kim Beazley Snr claiming that
he was principled or erudite in relation to the educational
funding of Australian education and in particular the education
of children in public schools. Kim Beazley Snr was protected by
Gough Whitlam and his bully boy tactics in relation to education
and the State Aid issue. Witness the treatment meted out to men
of principle like WIlliam Henry Hartley. This question is still
the elephant in the room for not only our political parties. It
is the basic problem underlying the erosion of our liberal,
democratic Australian society.
This elephant in the room assisted in the crushing and bruising
of Kim Beazley Senior to a state of exhaustion in 1973. He was
relieved for a while by Lionel Bowen, a politician more in tune
and able to deal with the Roman Catholic religious and secular
activists as well as mendacious Protestant school faction
and horse traders in the Country Party.
LISTEN TO THE DOGS RADIO PROGRAM
3CR 855
ON THE AM DIAL
12.00 noon ON Saturdays.
|