AUSTRALIAN
COUNCIL
FOR THE DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT
SCHOOLS - D.O.G.S.
PRESS RELEASE 285#.
17 FEBRUARY
2009
AISTRALIAN HIGH COURT
APPOINTMENTS
BY RUDD GOVERNMENT:
BLATANT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST
PUBLIC SCHOOL GRADUATES
On February 3, 2009, the Rudd Government appointed Virginia Bell
to replace Michael Kirby as a Justice on the Australian High
Court. Michael Kirby was a product of the Public School system
and proud to be so. See Press Release 284 at
www.adogs.info/pr284.htm. Virginia Bell is a product of
Sydney Church of England Girls Grammar School (SCEGGS).
On September 1, 2008, the Rudd Government appointed Robert
French as the Chief Justice of the Australian High Court. Like
Justice Toohey who was appointed by the ALP government in 1987,
Chief Justice Robert French is a product of St. Louis (Jesuit)
school, Western Australia.
The two justices appointed to the High Court by the Rudd
Government are products of the private church school networks.
After the appointment of Virginia Bell, only one of the High
Court Justices is a product of the public school system
throughout Australia. Susan Kiefel was appointed by John Howard
on September 3, 2007. She is the only one of the seven High
Court justices who attended a public secondary school, namely
Sandgate State High School, Queensland. To date, DOGS have not
discovered any indication of Susan Kiefel's defence of her
educational opportunities in her public school. In this she
differs from Justices Murphy and Kirby. Is she a public school
graduate in name only?
In the period since 1980, the Liberal National Party has
appointed nine persons to the High Court: two from the public
school sector; four from the Roman Catholic school sector; and
three from the non-Roman Catholic school sector. The Labor Party
has appointed seven High Court Justices: one from the public
sector; four from the Roman Catholic school sector; and two from
the non-Roman Catholic school sector.
In the period since 1980, the federal governments have appointed
sixteen persons to the High Court. Three were products of public
education; and thirteen were products of the church school
system.
The above figures indicate blatant favouritism by both the ALP
and the Coalition governments of private school networks and
gross discrimination against graduates from the public school
sector. If anything, they prove that the Roman Catholic networks
are stronger than any other old-boy and old-girl networks in
this country. The favouritism is readily apparent when one looks
at the sixteen appointments made since 1980. Eight have come up
through the Roman Catholic old-boy and old-girl networks; five
from the non-Roman Catholic old-boy and old-girl networks; and
three are from public schools, most of which do not enjoy
old-boy or old-girl networks at all.
In percentage terms, at least ten public school graduates should
have been appointed compared with the three who were appointed.
This situation gives the lie to the Australian egalitarian myth.
Private schools have eroded our democratic, legal and social
systems with their networks and made a nonsense of our classless
society. Their sectarian and sectionalist outcomes have created
a cancer in our body politic.
For further information on this subject, DOGS refer readers to
Press Release 123 at
www.adogs.info/pr123.htm and Press Release 261 at
www.adogs.info/pr261.htm .
Given the stacking of the High Court with sectarian school
products, the only reason for a return to the High Court on
Section 116 would be to expose the cancer in the body
politic, the products of the old and new religious
establishments.
LISTEN TO THE DOGS RADIO PROGRAM
3CR 855
ON THE AM DIAL
12.00 noon ON Saturdays.
|