AUSTRALIAN
COUNCIL
FOR THE DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT
SCHOOLS - D.O.G.S.
PRESS RELEASE 288#.
12 MARCH
2009
STATE GOVERNMENT PLACES
PUBLIC PROVISION OF
PUBLIC EDUCATION
AT MERCY OF
PRIVATE PROVISION IN NEW
DEVELOPMENTS
The Brumby government is following previous State Government
policy as far back as the 1970s in placing the provision of
public schools in new areas at the mercy of private development.
The current State Government is denying thousands of
parents wishing to choose a free, secular and universal school
education for their children for several years behind private
school provision.
Church schools have control of both the purchase and development
and provision of new land and buildings in outlying
developments. They have the power , legal ability, and
enterprise to purchase large tracts of land, subdivide it, then
build schools to their own timetable. They are assisted in this
private enterprise with taxpayers money.
Contrast this with the policies followed by the Victorian State
Governments since the 1970s. They have abdicated the power,
legal ability and enterprise to purchase land for new schools
before the developer provides the services to the relevant site.
This means that the State Government is at the mercy of private
developers whereas church schools operatives have kept control
of their own destiny.
No democratic government worth anything would give up the
responsibility and power to build its own schools before its
competitors. Or are Victorian public school parents still at the
mercy of the extreme neo-liberal Treasury economists from the
Kennett years who have made such an ungodly mess of our
financial system.
One of the reasons for growing enrolments in the private sector
is the lack of prompt provision of primary and secondary schools
in the newly developing areas.
DOGS provide a glaring example of the above situation. Please
note that the private developers are within their legal rights
to do what they have done and are going to do in their own good
time. The State government has decided that they will follow the
time-table set by the private developers and if they go broke
and fail to provide service, then public school parents will
have to wait for the next developer to either go broke in the
coming depression or provide roads, water, sewerage, electricity
and gas in their own good time.
Primary Schools at Mernda
Here is a typical example. There has recently been extensive
development at Mernda in the northern corridor of Melbourne.
There is an existing State primary school which has serviced the neighbourhood
for many years. It has a high morale and excellent
teachers. A brand new Catholic school has recently opened
nearby and is attracting students from the area. A new public
primary school is proposed for 2011 next to the Catholic school,
in a possible Public Private Partnership and some of the
remaining pupils from the original school may be shifted
across a very busy road.
DOGS quote from the Website of the current public school :
'While growth is often seen as a positive, it also will
impact upon the culture of the school. We have a dynamic,
friendly and interactive school community and it is important
that we retain the many positive strengths of our existing
school culture and interactions with our parent body and school
community.
Another decision that faces the school community is that the
government has announced that a new school will be built in
Mernda under the Public Private Partnership model [possibly] in
the year 2010. Our present site is well favored by many members
of the community for its access, safety and facilities. There
has been concern expressed about a split in the community
between the 'new' Mernda and the 'old' Mernda. The community
will need to make a decision about whether to support this
school or our present school site.'
So, here you have a happy, integrated school community of
children from many different social backgrounds in óld'
Mernda being divided : How? By new religious schools duplicating
existing primary facilities; de-stabilisation of public
provision; and the forcing of children into a possible 'shared
facilities' or private/public partnership situation next to a
Roman Catholic school on the other side of a very busy arterial
road.
Secondary Education at Mernda
Meanwhile, in the secondary area, there are already two
existing private schools in the area and another one proposed
for 2010. The Ivanhoe Grammar school and the Plenty Valley
Christian School have been aggressively touting for students for
some years, and the Uniting Church has acquired many acres of
prime development land for a large school, Ácacia College' and
various other activities. They are currently touting for
'expressions of interest'. Their website indicates that they
expect enrolments of 1200 students across levels Prep to Year
12. The proposed annual tuition fee ranges from $4,800 to
$5,800. The work has already commenced on this site. The Uniting
Church in the area attracts very few attendees to their church
and the South Morang Church has recently been closed and is
offered for sale.
There is nothing to prevent any of these religious schools from
selling portions of their land to developers for profit if its
fits their plans. Purchases of development land by
religious bodies have been assisted through the generous
assistance of billions of dollars
of taxpayers money.
But what is happening to the proposed Prep - Year 12 Public
Secondary school? After many letters, emails and phone calls,
DOGS discovered that nothing whatever is happening to the
provision of the choice of a public secondary school in the
Mernda developments. Anyone wishing to enrol their children in a
free secular and compulsory secondary school will have to bus
them on a dangerous road to Whittlesea or Mill 'Park.
Why? The proposed land for a public secondary school is in a
difficult site in a new development site. The
developer has not yet provided roads, sewerage, electricity, gas
or water to this acreage and has no immediate plans to do so.
Consequently the Minister, Bronwyn Pike and her Department of
Education bureaucrats have no plans or proposed opening date for
a secondary school on this site. Perhaps the Minister hopes that if she
can only wait long enough, there will be no need for public
provision in this new development. The parents and children will
have all been forced to pay fees and enrol their children in the
religious school if they want an education for their children in
the local geographical area.
If the developer goes broke in the coming depression, there
could be no public provision of a free secondary education for
children of parents who have lost their jobs in Mernda. They
will not be able to expect religious schools to offer a free
education. Even if they did offer charity it will come with a
religious price.
Education Minister and Her Department Have Lost Their
Way and Control over the Provision of Public Educatio
DOGS call upon Mr Brumby and his Minister for Education to
fulfil their democratic responsibilities to the Victorian
citizens and taxpayers.
Our taxes should be used for the provision of a quality free,
secular and universal public education system. Public resources should not
be channelled into religious organisations using scarce taxpayer
funds to acquire land and build fee paying schools in new
developing areas.
LISTEN TO THE DOGS RADIO PROGRAM
3CR 855
ON THE AM DIAL
12.00 noon ON Saturdays.
|