AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL FOR THE
DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS
PRESS RELEASE 356
THE MEDIA IN COMMENTARY ON
LEAGUES
TABLES:
Interesting
Facts and Figures
February 2,
2010
Once again the Sydney Morning Herald of February 1 provides
a more comprehensive view of Julia Gillard’s excuse for accountability and
transparency on the MySchool website. Whereas
Murdoch’s Australian continues to
peddle the ideas of Joel Klein from
It seems that Gillard’s
tables reveal more than initially meets the eye.
Caro and Bonnor’s research uncoveredf
gross inequities between public and private schools in teacher numbers.
According to enrolment and staffing stats for a selection of more than 20 large
(mostly 1000-plus enrolments) metropolitan schools taken from the My School
website, to get a teacher at a large, metropolitan non-government school you
need to have about 10.1 students. To get a teacher in a large, metropolitan
government school you need 14.8 students.
In terms of non-teaching staff in schools -
those employees who relieve teachers of administrative and other support tasks
- you need 21 students to get a support staff member in a large, metropolitan
non-government school and a staggering 84.4 students in a similar-sized
government school.
But, like all comparisons between schools,
these stats - while revealing - must be taken in context. The schools compared
are similar in total enrolment and geographical location, but many of the
non-government schools are K-12 schools that cater for boarders.
To check for this,
Caro and Bonnor point out that if the website is
correct and government schools are, on average, outperforming many of their
fee-charging equivalents, then government school teachers must be working very
hard indeed, against the odds. They not only teach more students, they are
given vastly less support to do so.
The urgent question is: how long can they
maintain this performance in the face of such skewed staffing handicaps?
Further inequalities were further revealed in
an article by Heath Gilmore in her article entitled Federal Support Favours the Privileged . She
compared the school ranked highest for the percentage of students from a
privileged backgrounbd- Knox Grammar (Presbyterian)
and Boggabilla, the school deemed to have the state’s
highest proportion of disadvantaged pupils, with all its
cohort Aboriginal. Whereas Bobbabilla is still
waiting federal government stimulus money to build a library,
.
One school has been ranked the highest in NSW
for the percentage of students from a privileged background. The other school
was deemed to have the state's highest proportion of disadvantaged pupils, with
all its cohort Aboriginal.
Boggabilla is awaiting final approval on federal government stimulus money to build a
library, Knox Grammar is overseeing a multimillion-dollar construction program
for a new boarding centre and a great hall/aquatic centre with three
Olympic-size indoor basketball courts, a performance centre and an indoor
50-metre swimming pool. On the construction site billboard, Knox acknowledges
the generous contribution made by the federal government to the project.
So, under Julia Gillard's My School website,
the outrageous inequities in our education system, largely caused by taxpayer
funding of the private sector is available online.
The ranking of the Boggabilla
Central at the bottom and Knox Grammar at the top, is
in the website's Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage. There appears
to be political and bureaucratic sensitivity about the inequities revealed on
the website, although whether this will ever translate into action when Gillard
and her policy advisers are confronted with the Catholic hierarchy and
Protestants jealous of their privileges, is another matter.
Nevertheless, we are informed that Peter
Hill, the chief executive of the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting
Authority, said the website would shine a light on ''what schools need
additional resources and assistance''.
He said the next version of the website,
detailing the financial resources of the each school, with the amount spent per
capita on each student, would highlight any inequities. It is extraordinary
that the funding data has not appeared before or currently with the performance
tests. After all, how can you test and outcome without the input? Is it
possible that Gillard has produced a smokescreen to mask her own lack of
ministerial responsibility?
DOGS wonder whether the full funding figures
for the private religious sector will ever appear. Perhaps, to quote Caro and Bonnor, it is time
transparency and accountability was pushed up the food chain.
DEFEND PUBLIC EDUCATION AND STOP STATE AID TO PRIVATE RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.
Listen to the DOGS program
3CR, 855 on the A.M. dial
12 Noon Saturdays