AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL FOR THE
DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS
PRESS RELEASE 374
WILL CHILDREN BE ALLOCATED
SCHOOL PLACES BY LOTTERY?
THE LATEST IDEA IN FREE
MARKET IDEOLOGY
14
April 2010
An insidious mix of selection by ability, faith and postcode is wreaking
havoc on the entire schools system.
Although the above newspaper heading
describes the current educational situation in
·
While the mainstream politicians
in both the
She writes about a recent report
entitled Worlds Apart:
Ignore the headlines about a
few comprehensives being more socially selective than some grammar schools.
It is a red herring. Today's report Worlds Apart
flags up, yet again, that after 20 years of education reforms most of our
schools are still conspicuously divided along class lines.
The culprits are selection by ability, by aptitude, by faith and postcode.
This insidious mix of overt and covert selection wreaks havoc on the entire
system. Deflecting attention from one type of school to another, and then on to
lotteries is an inspired way of distracting people from the real issues.
The Sutton Trust, co-sponsors of this report with the University of
Buckingham, does much good work, but also has an abiding passion for grammar
schools. It's founder Sir Peter Lampl clings to the notion that dividing
children by academic ability at the age of 11 will increase social mobility.
Even the Tories have renounced that idea. However narrowing the public
discussion to whether a tiny number of upmarket comprehensive schools have more
middle-class children than some grammar schools, using data from the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index, which
shows family income level and not just eligibility for free school meals, suits
his argument well.
But read the report through and it is clear that schools which use the
11-plus test are still the worst offenders (after the private schools, which aren't
mentioned at all) when it comes to social division. They take fewer children on
free school meals and hoover up the most able students in any area where they
still exist, ensuring the rest (often having failed a highly competitive
entrance test) go to other local schools that have no chance of a real
comprehensive mix.
Many other schools in those areas feel obliged to introduce some sort of
partial, aptitude or covert social selection by faith in order to compete. And
so it goes on, with schools being ever more subtly stratified by ability,
class, race and residential geography as crafty parents also rent, lie and
cheat their way into school places in the most sought after schools – the tactics for which
are now well documented by the schools adjudicator.
Substitute ‘selective high
schools’ for grammar schools and Fiona could be talking about
The authors of Worlds Apart are clear. Forget about Swedish style reforms,
they will only create more autonomous, own admissions schools and increase
social segregation. And be sceptical about the idea of a pupil premium. No
government will be able to afford the sums of money that will incentivise
schools to take on the most challenging pupils, rather than the ones most
likely to boost their league table positions.
Their answer is the universal use of lotteries but allied to all of the
above so grammar school places would be allocated by lottery to children who
pass the 11-plus, faith school places to children whose families pass the faith
test and so on.
Lotteries do have the benefit of wiping out the cheats – there is not much
point lying about your address or temporarily renting on the doorstep of a
popular school if that doesn't increase your child's chance of a place.
But lotteries can only iron out
inequalities if they are ability, class, race, faith and postcode blind.
So before we talk about introducing them nationwide, let's go back to the root
causes of social segregation rather than distract attention from them. That
means reducing inequalities in society at large, dealing with poor housing and
investing heavily in early-years provision for disadvantaged families.
So Fiona Millar finally ends up
with something close to the DOGS position. The only way that education can cut
across the class divide and reduce inequality at large is through a public
system and public services which are free secular and universal. In the UK education
it means ending academic selection once and for all (see
here how it could be done), removing the right of schools to select by
aptitude or run their own school banding systems from the School
Admissions Code and ending the right of schools to select by
"faith-based" criteria. In
Australia it means, at least, a return to the days when only the public systems
open to all children regardless of class,
culture, creed or geographical position were publicly funded.
Who knows, if these are achieved,
placing children in a lottery of schools bouncing around in a barrel of league
tables may just become a forgotten nightmare.
DEFEND PUBLIC EDUCATION AND STOP STATE AID TO PRIVATE RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.
Listen to the DOGS program
3CR, 855 on the A.M. dial
12 Noon Saturdays