AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL FOR THE DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT
SCHOOLS
PRESS RELEASE 402
KENNETT CHICKENS COMING HOME TO ROOST:
FUNDING SYSTEM UNJUST
2 October 2010
The Kennett public school closures of the 1990’s
(remember the battle for Richmond?) and the sale of prime public lands to
sectarian schools and developers now means a chronic dearth of public school
places in Melbourne. The Age of 20
October 2010 revealed these shortages in the inner northern region of
Melbourne. However, the Press have not yet revealed the dearth of public school
facilities in the newly developing areas of Melbourne where the sectarian,
private sector, for example, have duplicated their own facilities. But the
choice of a public education is not yet available to large numbers of young
families in the heavily mortgaged McMansions of outer
Melbourne.
In Mernda for example, there is a small public
primary school in the old suburb, a brand new Catholic primary school in the
new development across the road, Ivanhoe Grammar and Acacia College, and the
Plenty Valley Christian School for those who can pay and pass religious tests.
And now a Muslim Shia (as opposed to Sunni or Druse) school is planned in a
heritage building, an old State school abandoned by the Education Department in
the 1980s.
Meanwhile, out in the country areas, with the
closure of many little bush schools, cash strapped Victorian farmers have the
choice of home schooling or hours of travel on dangerous roads to the nearest
public school. You don’t find too many sectarian schools in these ‘uneconomic’
areas.
What
price choice? What price the education of the nation’s children?
The Victorian Labor Party
in general, and the Minister for Education, Bronwyn
Pike in particular, will discover widespread disaffection of members of the
radical middle class in inner Melbourne in the State election.
No matter how loud the insecure middle class demands
for “choice”; no matter how many times politicians want to preach “transparency
and accountability” and beat students, teachers, principals and their schools
with the NAPLAN stick; funding remains the key determinant of quality
educational provision.
The sectarian school lobby knows this only too well.
Our Labor and Coalition
politicians have caved in to middle class self-interest, a nasty pill coated
with religious hypocrisy served up to taxpayers and children of low income
families. Our Green politicians are happy to receive the public school vote,
but speak with uncertain voice. Although the Australian Education Union has
been strong in its support of public funding for public education, only the New
South Wales Teachers Federation is prepared to do something really constructive
about the current situation. As their Deputy President, Gary Zadkovich, writes in the August edition of Education,
Equal
opportunity for all children, regardless of one’s circumstances of birth, needs
and abilities, socio-economic status, religion, race, class and gender, is
surely an ideal by which the betterment of mankind is measured.
They are concerned about the future of the Schools
Funding Review, although DOGS have no illusions about the outcome of a panel
that is stacked with private school free market ideologues and a report
determined by inadequate terms of reference. The Teachers Federation urges
public school parents, teachers and principals to work to ensure that the call
for a new, fairer system becomes politically irresistible in the lead in to the
next federal election.
Meanwhile, on August 14, Federation Council endorsed
a proposal to investigate the commissioning of an independently conducted
review, should the federal government review not proceed. This would be
conducted in a similar vein to the successful Inquiry into the Provision of
Public Education in NSW, conducted by Tony Vinson in 2001-2.
DOGS wish them well in their effort to mobilize
public opinion in favour of a new, fairer funding system.
However, DOGS
also note that a fairer funding system will only be possible when the heavily
funded sectarian sector is taken over and made public in purpose, public in
outcome, public in access – with no entrance tests for students, staff, or
administrators – public in ownership and control, public in accountability and
therefore enjoying sole public funding. It should also be public in provision,
with governments taking responsibility for a high quality education of every
child in the nation. It is national suicide to contract this essential
provision out to religious organisations with a vested interest in peculiar
beliefs and tribal loyalties.
Germany, Finland, France, America and other nations
do not make this mistake. Even the UK is demanding public enrolment with no
religious tests in British ‘faith’ schools. Australia learnt this basic lesson
for nation building in the years 1880 to 1964. Do we, our children and our
children’s children have to learn the lesson all over again – the hard way?
DEFEND PUBLIC EDUCATION AND STOP STATE AID
TO PRIVATE RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.
Listen to
the DOGS program
3CR, 855 on
the A.M. dial
12 Noon
Saturdays