AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL FOR THE DEFENCE OF GOVERNMENT
SCHOOLS
PRESS RELEASE 415
FORTY
YEARS OF ‘NEEDS’ POLICIES
HAVE
FAILED:
ONLY
A GENUINELY PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM CAN DELIVER
EQUITABLE
OUTCOMES
January
29 2011
The AEU and 1700 submissions from the Public Schools for our Future Campaign
to the Government’s funding review have persuaded David Gonski
to embrace the rhetoric of ‘equity’. The AEU and the NSW Teachers Federation
and Trevor Cobbold from the Save Our Schools group
are to be congratulated for forcing the panel to confront the gross inequities
and misleading statistics promoted by lobbyists for the private sector.
However, this does not mean that he has rejected the
rhetoric of ‘choice and diversity’ or the market ideology of the sectarian
sector. And, whatever the political spin, the objectives of the public and private
systems are diametrically opposed.
The sectarian sector, by its exclusive nature can
never deliver equitable outcomes. Only a public system available to all children can deliver
this.
Nevertheless, the speech delivered by Mr
Gonski at the AEU Federal Conference is of particular
interest, if only because of its rhetoric. Consider the following report on the
AEU website at http://forourfuture.org.au/675971.html
Mr Gonski said ..
“This review provides a genuine
opportunity to look at funding arrangements for schooling that are currently in
place and see how well they support all students to reach their education
potential,” he explained.
“Our aim is to provide advice to the
Australian government on a funding system for schools that is transparent,
fair, equitable and financially sustainable.
“We understand this is a complex task,
but without underestimating the challenges, each member of the panel is excited
about the possibilities this review can allow.”
Mr Gonski
emphasised the ongoing importance of a strong
public school system and said the review was examining the reasons behind the
shift in enrolments from public to private schools and the impact of that
shift.
He said many submissions by AEU
members had painted a compelling picture of the current environments in which
teachers and students learn and work.
In outlining the key areas of work being undertaken, Mr Gonski
said the review was particularly focused on breaking the link between social
and economic disadvantage and poor education outcomes.
“For the purpose of review, the panel
believes that the focus on equity should be ensuring that differences in educational
outcomes are not the result of differences in wealth, income, power or
possession,” Mr Gonski said.
“I should add that the current PM
[Prime Minister] put it very nicely recently when she said that demography
should not equal destiny.
“We’ve heard from many people and
observed educational disadvantage being increasingly concentrated in certain
systems and in certain schools.
“As you all know probably better than
me, disadvantage is often determined by Indigenous status, non-English speaking
backgrounds (including refugees and migrants), disability, geographical
remoteness, and low socioeconomic status. And it’s usually multiplied in most
contexts.
“The charge for our panel will be to
consider funding arrangements that will be able to address this current
disadvantage.”
The expert panel conducting the review
issued an
emerging issues paper in December which is open for public comment until
the end of March.
The AEU has welcomed the commitment to
set out in the discussion paper to equity in education and the willingness of
the review panel to consider alternatives to the flawed SES funding model,
currently used to distribute Commonwealth funding to private schools.
In reply to Mr Gonski,
AEU Federal President Angelo Gavrielatos told the
conference the union strongly supported the expert panel’s definition of equity
as ensuring differences in educational outcomes were not the result of
differences in wealth, income, power or possession.
The current glaring inequities in Australian
education in which two thirds of the
nation’s children attending public schools are short changed in favour of those attending sectarian institutions indicate a
failure of the ‘Needs’ policies of the last forty years. Gonski
should remember that since 1964 taxpayer subsidization of the sectarian sector
which commenced because the Catholic Church was short-changing about 15% of
Australian children, has failed. The unholy Catholic-Protestant alliance forged
when the Treasury millions poured forth meant that wealthy schools have always
benefitted before any crumbs could trickle down to the poor.
Taxpayer funding has failed
to address ‘Need’ in the sectarian sector. It has only encouraged the
establishment of more ‘needy’sectarian schools. We
still, periodically, hear about poor parents slaving to pay fees in the private
sector..
But worse, much worse, taxpayer
subsidization of the private sector has
led to a downgrading and under-funding of the public sector, the sector which
caters for the vast majority of children from disadvantaged backgrounds,
children who have no choice apart from that offered by the public system.
Australia is quickly becoming a divided society, dividing its children not only
on the basis of wealth, income, power and possession. It is dividing them on
the basis of religion. We are duplicating expensive school infrastructure to
please a sectarian minority. The Menzies government
decisions of 1964 have led us back to 1844 when it was discovered that the
outcome of the ‘denominational’system was to leave
the majority at risk in favour of the minority.
The current situation was
and is predictable.
In 1973 DOGS wrote and made
oral submissions to the Karmel Committee pointing out
that the only system which can address disadvantage and educate a citizenry for
a democratic state is a public system. Such a system must be public in purpose,
outcome, access, ownership, control, accountability, and provision. It can only
do educate the citizenry and provide the cement for a heterogeneous society, if
it enjoys sole public funding. Our nineteenth century forefathers worked this
out in the second half of that century. Our politicians took our country back
in time and revisited the mistakes of an eighteenth century class ridden,
church dominated Europe. They succeeded in doing this in the second half of the
twentieth century while European countries like Finland, Norway, Sweden and
Germany were strengthening their public systems.
For the last forty years our
politicians have poured public money into the coffers of sectarian institutions
which select children on the basis of ability to pay and the religious belief
of their parents. Their lobbyists have used funds to promote their system to
insecure middle class parents. They have also undermined the schools and centralised structures of the public system. At the same time that they have centralised
their bureaucracies and lobbying in the national capital.
How can such a sectarian
system of education with objectives that select and exclude children do
anything else but create disadvantage?
It is not enough for David Gonski to mouth the correct rhetoric to the AEU Conference.
He and his panel need to learn from the mistakes of Karmel
in 1973 and address the real issues. Australia cannot afford to publicly fund a
sectarian system which creates division and disadvantage among our children.
Listen to the DOGS program
3CR, 855 on
the A.M. dial
12 Noon
Saturdays